Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? (2011)

Peer-Reviewed Study · Goldman GS, Miller NZ · September 1, 2011

The 2011 Human & Experimental Toxicology paper in the book's flag is Goldman & Miller: an ecological, country-level regression of infant mortality on the count of routinely recommended vaccine doses. It is NOT a hepatitis B vaccine study and does NOT find that any vaccine makes babies '3x more likely to die.' A later re-analysis ('Infant Vaccination Does Not Predict Increased Infant Mortality Rate: Correcting Past Misinformation,' medRxiv 2021/2022) reports that correcting their method removes the association.

An ecological regression of national infant mortality rates against the number of routinely given vaccine doses across countries.

Abstract (Hum Exp Toxicol 30:1420-8)

The 2011 Human & Experimental Toxicology paper in the book's flag is Goldman & Miller: an ecological, country-level regression of infant mortality on the count of routinely recommended vaccine doses. It is NOT a hepatitis B vaccine study and does NOT find that any vaccine makes babies '3x more likely to die.' A later re-analysis ('Infant Vaccination Does Not Predict Increased Infant Mortality Rate: Correcting Past Misinformation,' medRxiv 2021/2022) reports that correcting their method removes the association. The book misattributes this study's subject and outcome. The hepatitis B '3x' figure traces instead to Gallagher & Goodman 2010 (MMD-35), which measured autism, not death.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov 3. Know who you're voting for: your values vs. their record, with sources.Build my Vote Card →