The retracted article was republished with an editor’s note explaining the purpose of republication. Republication was not independent replication, validation, or a finding that the original conclusions were correct.
any kind of appraisal of the paper’s content should not be connoted
Editor’s note
The retracted article was republished with an editor’s note explaining the purpose of republication. Republication was not independent replication, validation, or a finding that the original conclusions were correct. Bearing on the claim: partly supports. Verification note: Article and editor’s note opened; verified archive wildcard. Republication is not independent validation.