Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant, Mosley v. Emerson, No. COA26-132 (2026)

Court Filing · Prisha Mosley, by counsel · July 28, 2026

Mosley’s reply argues that HB 805 revived malpractice and negligent-infliction claims and that she deserves trial on fraud, facilitating fraud, and civil conspiracy. It is party advocacy, not a court holding.

Prisha Is Entitled to a Trial on Her Claims for Fraud, Facilitating Fraud, and Civil Conspiracy.

Mosley’s reply argues that HB 805 revived malpractice and negligent-infliction claims and that she deserves trial on fraud, facilitating fraud, and civil conspiracy. It is party advocacy, not a court holding. The brief quotes defendants’ joint brief as saying the treatment details were not relevant to that brief.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov 3. Know who you're voting for: your values vs. their record, with sources.Build my Vote Card →