Cook et al.: Reply to Tol’s Comment on the Consensus Study (2016)

Peer-Reviewed Study · John Cook et al. · 2016

Cook et al., Environmental Research Letters: the authors reply to Tol that papers taking no position were rightly left out of the 97% count and that treating them as rejection is inconsistent. The authors defending their own study.

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A reply to Tol’s comment

Cook et al., Environmental Research Letters: the authors reply to Tol that papers taking no position were rightly left out of the 97% count and that treating them as rejection is inconsistent. The authors defending their own study.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov 3. Know who you're voting for: your values vs. their record, with sources.Build my Vote Card →