Schmidt v. City of Norfolk, Document 191

Court Filing · Chief Judge Mark S. Davis, E.D. Va. · January 27, 2026

Schmidt v. Norfolk, January 2026: after discovery, the judge ruled for Norfolk on summary judgment, finding the evidence did not show the cameras captured the whole of a person's movements. The plaintiffs appealed.

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 112) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 107) is DENIED.

p. 51 (printed opinion page)

Schmidt v. Norfolk, January 2026: after discovery, the judge ruled for Norfolk on summary judgment, finding the evidence did not show the cameras captured the whole of a person's movements. The plaintiffs appealed.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov 3. Know who you're voting for: your values vs. their record, with sources.Build my Vote Card →