The substituted opinion found likely coercion or significant encouragement by five listed government actors, reversed as to others, and narrowed the injunction. These remained preliminary likelihood findings, not final merits holdings.
Ultimately, we find the district court did not err in determining that several officials—namely the White House, the Surgeon General, the CDC, the FBI, and CISA—likely coerced or significantly encouraged social-media platforms to moderate content, rendering those decisions state actions.
PDF p. 61
The substituted opinion found likely coercion or significant encouragement by five listed government actors, reversed as to others, and narrowed the injunction. These remained preliminary likelihood findings, not final merits holdings. Bearing on the claim: partly supports. Verification note: First page states that the prior opinion is withdrawn and substituted.