The Supreme Court held that neither the individual nor state plaintiffs established Article III standing, reversed the Fifth Circuit, and remanded. It reversed on standing and did not rule on the First Amendment merits.
We therefore lack jurisdiction to reach the merits of the dispute.
PDF p. 24
The Supreme Court held that neither the individual nor state plaintiffs established Article III standing, reversed the Fifth Circuit, and remanded. It reversed on standing and did not rule on the First Amendment merits. Bearing on the claim: partly supports. Verification note: Also states: “We begin—and end—with standing.” Footnote 3 expresses no view on the Fifth Circuit state-action standard.